DeltaV wrote:Did a Villanova person push you around or something when you were a kid? You spend more time in this thread, which is supposed to be about St. Joes, complaining about Nova.
DeltaV wrote:Nova doesn't have to 'block' St. Joes, because they're not the same caliber team as the others being considered. Even without considering the desire to expand to include more media and recruiting markets, St. Joes isn't the same caliber team as others being considered. If you think it is, lets hear your reasons, otherwise stop crying about big bad Nova being mean.
NDGradXUFan wrote:DeltaV wrote:Did a Villanova person push you around or something when you were a kid? You spend more time in this thread, which is supposed to be about St. Joes, complaining about Nova.
No. I grew up in Ohio, and until I moved to D.C., I only knew one person who ever attended Villanova. Irrespective of whether Villanova would actually take active steps to block St. Joe's invitation into the league, the suggestion is always met rejection and one rationale - "Nova, Nova, Nova." In other words, even if Villanova isn't blocking an invitation, they are always cited as the primary reason St. Joe's shouldn't be in the league.DeltaV wrote:Nova doesn't have to 'block' St. Joes, because they're not the same caliber team as the others being considered. Even without considering the desire to expand to include more media and recruiting markets, St. Joes isn't the same caliber team as others being considered. If you think it is, lets hear your reasons, otherwise stop crying about big bad Nova being mean.
Again, the Nova hubris rears its head. St. Joe's has a respectable program, good history, and intense fan base (even if smaller than Nova's). And if you don't think being in the same league would enhance the rivalry, and potentially elevate St. Joe's to your level, then you're crazy, arrogant, in denial, or some combination thereof.
DeltaV wrote: Do you have any basketball argument that St. Joes belongs in the conference?
NDGradXUFan wrote:DeltaV wrote: Do you have any basketball argument that St. Joes belongs in the conference?
Yeah, I just made it.
classof29 wrote:How is this argument still going? It shouldn't have even started in the first place.
I like St. Joes, I am sure most do, but they are not the caliber program that the Big East is looking for. It's that simple. Just throwing out the name of a school and saying "why not" isn't going to change anything.
classof29 wrote:How is this argument still going? It shouldn't have even started in the first place.
I like St. Joes, I am sure most do, but they are not the caliber program that the Big East is looking for. It's that simple. Just throwing out the name of a school and saying "why not" isn't going to change anything.
Muskie wrote:classof29 wrote:How is this argument still going? It shouldn't have even started in the first place.
I like St. Joes, I am sure most do, but they are not the caliber program that the Big East is looking for. It's that simple. Just throwing out the name of a school and saying "why not" isn't going to change anything.
Look I like Martelli. He's good for a soundbite and a decent coach. I don't see St. Joe's being the next addition. There are many schools I think should be considered way before St. Joe's.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 16 guests