Jet915 wrote:I think you just put Dayton in the east and Xavier in the west based on geography. I know they are rivals but they will still play once a year and if they wanted to, they can play one non-conference game a year as well.
HallHoops wrote:Jet915 wrote:I think you just put Dayton in the east and Xavier in the west based on geography. I know they are rivals but they will still play once a year and if they wanted to, they can play one non-conference game a year as well.
I wouldn't want to break up the Xavier-Dayton rivalry, that's an asset for the new conference.
I'd add Butler to the East for 3 reasons:
1) Easy to get to Indianapolis for the other East schools.
2) No established rivalries with the Midwest schools.
3) Other than Georgetown, the East schools are currently not very good in mens basketball, they need a boost to that side of the new conference.
Jet915 wrote:18,458, standing room only for EVANSVILLE. I was even surprised by the number, 2nd highest ever, we had 18,735 against Wichita State last year.
thefish7 wrote:Jet915 wrote:18,458, standing room only for EVANSVILLE. I was even surprised by the number, 2nd highest ever, we had 18,735 against Wichita State last year.
And you guys want to leave a rivalry like that behind????
Back on topic, I think the travel thing is a bigger deal. Not for basketball, so much, but you're not going to be scheduling direct flights for conference games in your other sports. Could be that Creighton adds enough cache to a new league, that they'll agree to subsidize the travel. Otherwise, I think it'll be a bigger problem than people suspect. Don't get me wrong, if CU gets the offer, they should probably take it... Just not sure it'll work out over time as people think/want if CU ends up that far out on an island by themselves.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 2 guests