Hearing Creighton is #10

The home for Big East hoops

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby Jet915 » Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:10 pm

XU85 wrote:
jkc_dawgs wrote:Anybody think they are making the announcement today?


Doubt it, but let's get this done, it is starting to interfere with my productivity!


My productivity has been interfered with since December.... :lol:
User avatar
Jet915
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:44 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby blueblood » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:04 pm

If Creighton is in why is the 9 member number thrown out so much. On CBS yesterday during the halftime of the Michigan-Michigan State game they said 9 with Butler and Xavier. Why is Creighton the one that is always left off? I am not being sensitive about Creighton being left off just thinking there must be a reason.
blueblood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:59 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby BillEsq » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:15 pm

blueblood wrote:If Creighton is in why is the 9 member number thrown out so much. On CBS yesterday during the halftime of the Michigan-Michigan State game they said 9 with Butler and Xavier. Why is Creighton the one that is always left off? I am not being sensitive about Creighton being left off just thinking there must be a reason.


Slow newsday.. hot topic... lets face it in the past month they have said 9-16 hell some article out there a few weeks ago said 18. Is it possible sure... will people read your article sure... does anyone outside of fox know, hell no... smart money has always been on 10 or 12 with 12 being the most rational or 10 moving to 12 in the near future. If your going to take Creighton you just take them as their MVC exit fee is pretty manageable. I think the best argument for 10 over 12 i've seen so far is the A-10 exit fee's but lets face it 6 vs 8 million in fees is not going to stop a 400 million dollar contract. Fox needs, wants and is going to get more inventory. That said last summer CUSA and the MWC actually agreed to merge into some 31 team atrocity so maybe its 9 teams maybe its a 42 team papal conference who knows.
BillEsq
 
Posts: 812
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2013 6:30 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby blueblood » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:19 pm

But I assume there must something up with Creighton. You always see Butler and Xavier listed but not always Creighton. Is that on the 7s side or Creighton's side or both and why?
blueblood
 
Posts: 11
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2013 12:59 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby admin » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:20 pm

blueblood wrote:But I assume there must something up with Creighton. You always see Butler and Xavier listed but not always Creighton. Is that on the 7s side or Creighton's side or both and why?

I don't think there's ever been consensus on Creighton from the C7 like there has been with XU and Butler from the start.
admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 1443
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2012 10:35 am

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby yorost » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:32 pm

BillEsq wrote:lets face it in the past month they have said 9-16 hell some article out there a few weeks ago said 18.

You can drop that bottom to 7, as well. Some report even said the 7 would be willing to play 1 season with no additions if it meant getting out immediately.
User avatar
yorost
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:28 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby JohnT » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:46 pm

People think this is fluid whereas I've been told it is not. The teams were decided long ago. Nothing has changed. Lot of details and contracts to draft but the core of the decision has remained constant.

Again, this is just what I'm hearing but what the reports are saying now is pretty much what I heard a couple of months ago.
JohnT
 
Posts: 110
Joined: Thu Jan 03, 2013 10:15 am

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby Noonzy » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:49 pm

I hear the same-3 teams in for next season and UD and STL for the 2014 season-have been hearing it's been a done deal for quite some time.
Providence College
Noonzy
 
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:31 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby DeltaV » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:52 pm

blueblood wrote:If Creighton is in why is the 9 member number thrown out so much. On CBS yesterday during the halftime of the Michigan-Michigan State game they said 9 with Butler and Xavier. Why is Creighton the one that is always left off? I am not being sensitive about Creighton being left off just thinking there must be a reason.


CBS is functionally retarded. During the same halftime show, one of their talking half wits asked seriously if the conference would be named 'The Catholic Conference'.
'Nova MechE, Swimming
User avatar
DeltaV
 
Posts: 547
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:43 pm

Re: Hearing Creighton is #10

Postby yorost » Mon Mar 04, 2013 1:57 pm

JohnT wrote:People think this is fluid whereas I've been told it is not. The teams were decided long ago. Nothing has changed. Lot of details and contracts to draft but the core of the decision has remained constant.

Again, this is just what I'm hearing but what the reports are saying now is pretty much what I heard a couple of months ago.

Maybe they decided months ago, but that doesn't change the way it has been seen from the outside. We don't know those decision, if they were made, so it is fluid from our perspective. We aren't discussing things as though our decisions or opinions will matter, it's speculation and entertainment.
User avatar
yorost
 
Posts: 793
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2013 3:28 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 31 guests