23-24 NET Ratings

The home for Big East hoops

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby stever20 » Sun Jan 21, 2024 12:55 pm

Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.

but 4 Q1 wins really helps obviously. And also 4-4 away from home isn't too bad.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Sponsor

Sponsor
 

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby Hall2012 » Sun Jan 21, 2024 3:06 pm

Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.


60 is a concern for a team picked 9th and not expected to even sniff the postseason???
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby stever20 » Sun Jan 21, 2024 4:55 pm

to me the only concern with Seton Hall at 60 is if they were to fall apart, they could drop below 75 and all the wins against them at Seton Hall would be Q2 wins instead of Q1 wins. That's really it IMO.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby Hall2012 » Sun Jan 21, 2024 8:52 pm

It's certainly possible considering nearly all of SHU's production comes from the starting 5 and Richmond & Davis are already playing through injuries, but as far as I'm concerned they've already been a major surprise and are playing with house money.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby Omaha1 » Sun Jan 21, 2024 9:28 pm

Hall2012 wrote:
Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.


60 is a concern for a team picked 9th and not expected to even sniff the postseason???

Without knowing the historical importance of NET in receiving an at large bid, 60 is a lot higher than I expected Hall to be considering the wins they’ve accumulated.
Nebraska by birth, Creighton by choice.
Omaha1
 
Posts: 3292
Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 9:27 am

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby Hall2012 » Mon Jan 22, 2024 4:43 am

Omaha1 wrote:
Hall2012 wrote:
Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.


60 is a concern for a team picked 9th and not expected to even sniff the postseason???

Without knowing the historical importance of NET in receiving an at large bid, 60 is a lot higher than I expected Hall to be considering the wins they’ve accumulated.


The OOC was bad. They were around 105 in mid-late December, so they've climbed substantially with their turnaround. If they continue winning enough to finish with a tournament worthy resume, I expect their NET will also have improved enough to reflect that and won't be holding them back. Maybe for seeding, but not for getting in.
Seton Hall Pirates
Big East Tournament Champions: 1991, 1993, 2016
Big East Regular Season Champions: 1992, 1993, 2020
Hall2012
 
Posts: 3462
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2013 3:04 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby stever20 » Mon Jan 22, 2024 8:54 am

I think 5 games really hurting Seton Hall with the NET.

7 point loss to #95 Rutgers at home
6 point win to #127 Missouri neutral
4 point win to #176 Georgetown away
11 point win to #166 St Peters home
9 point win to #177 Monmouth home
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby stever20 » Mon Jan 22, 2024 12:10 pm

So for fun looking at RPI and comparing to the NET today....
Butler N 66 R 94
Creighton N 12 R 25
Conn N 9 R 13
DeP N 310 R 275
Geo N 176 R 228
M N 17 R 18
P N 58 R 76
SH N 60 R 42
SJ N 41 R 46
V N 38 R 58
X N 43 R 66

avg NET: 75.45
avg RPI: 85.55

So Seton Hall the only team worse in NET than in RPI(outside of DePaul). With of the core 9 5 at least 10 spots better in NET. With 3 of them at least 18 spots better. Massive difference really this year.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby stever20 » Sun Jan 28, 2024 10:05 am

stever20 wrote:to me the only concern with Seton Hall at 60 is if they were to fall apart, they could drop below 75 and all the wins against them at Seton Hall would be Q2 wins instead of Q1 wins. That's really it IMO.

And sure enough a rough week and their NET is down to 75. 3 straight losses taken them from 54 to 75.
stever20
 
Posts: 13488
Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 1:43 pm

Re: 23-24 NET Ratings

Postby Jet915 » Sun Jan 28, 2024 2:05 pm

stever20 wrote:
stever20 wrote:to me the only concern with Seton Hall at 60 is if they were to fall apart, they could drop below 75 and all the wins against them at Seton Hall would be Q2 wins instead of Q1 wins. That's really it IMO.

And sure enough a rough week and their NET is down to 75. 3 straight losses taken them from 54 to 75.


Damn Kadary and his "soreness" lol
User avatar
Jet915
Moderator
Moderator
 
Posts: 5832
Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:44 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Big East basketball message board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 12 guests