Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.
Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.
Hall2012 wrote:Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.
60 is a concern for a team picked 9th and not expected to even sniff the postseason???
Omaha1 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:Omaha1 wrote:Hall at 60 has to be a concern.
60 is a concern for a team picked 9th and not expected to even sniff the postseason???
Without knowing the historical importance of NET in receiving an at large bid, 60 is a lot higher than I expected Hall to be considering the wins they’ve accumulated.
stever20 wrote:to me the only concern with Seton Hall at 60 is if they were to fall apart, they could drop below 75 and all the wins against them at Seton Hall would be Q2 wins instead of Q1 wins. That's really it IMO.
stever20 wrote:stever20 wrote:to me the only concern with Seton Hall at 60 is if they were to fall apart, they could drop below 75 and all the wins against them at Seton Hall would be Q2 wins instead of Q1 wins. That's really it IMO.
And sure enough a rough week and their NET is down to 75. 3 straight losses taken them from 54 to 75.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 16 guests