Django wrote:I'd rather have 4-5 that all make it to the second weekend.
DudeAnon wrote:Django wrote:I'd rather have 4-5 that all make it to the second weekend.
Agreed. And I think we are well set up to do that. X, Seton Hall, UConn, Nova and Providence should all be top 6 seeds.
Friars4Life wrote:Strange year for the A10. No great teams and a lot of bad losses, but they are 15-11 vs. P5 teams. Make of that what you will.
Friars4Life wrote:Strange year for the A10. No great teams and a lot of bad losses, but they are 15-11 vs. P5 teams. Make of that what you will.
marquette wrote:Friars4Life wrote:Strange year for the A10. No great teams and a lot of bad losses, but they are 15-11 vs. P5 teams. Make of that what you will.
Interesting. Looks like:
Davison 1-0 (Alabama)
Bonaventure 1(Clemson)-1(Va. Tech)
URI 2-0 (both against BC, weirdly enough)
SLU 1(BC)-1(Auburn)
Richmond 1(NC State)-2(Maryland, Miss. State)
VCU 2(Vanderbilt, Syracuse)-1(Baylor)
Dayton 3(Miami, Kansas, Va. Tech)-1(Mississippi)
UMass 2-0 (Penn State, Rutgers)
Fordham 0-1 (Miami)
G. Mason 2(Georgia, Maryland)-1(Washington)
St. Joe's 0-1(USC)
La Salle 0-0
Duquesne 0-0
G. Wash. 0-1 (Maryland)
A couple nice wins in there but for the most part not a murderer's row.
Davidson and Bonaventure both have some decent wins. If they can dominate the A10 they could be in a position for at-large bids. SLU and URI could be decent wins for them in league play, and Richmond, VCU, and Dayton are ok too. I don't think Bona has enough depth to win the A10 tournament so they have the potential for a bid thief if someone knocks off Davidson. I'm guessing 2 bids for them this year, but I wouldn't be shocked at 3.
stever20 wrote:What is funny is Dayton who had the best there also had 1 Q3 and 3 Q4 losses. Only 4-3 vs Q4 right now. But 3-0 vs Q1.
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 40 guests