Xudash wrote:kayako wrote:So, you would agree that holds true for St. Joe's as well? A national title and coaching stability out of them, then we entertain accepting St. Joe's into the Big East?
Cheech wrote:Money ...TV controls sports. With the virus the game has significantly changed. The BE will go to 12 quicker than expected because of the new reality. Dayton financially is stronger than most BE schools and fits the model. On the court as I told you last summer Grant has taken Dayton to the next level. Coach of year, player of year and hosted College Game Day. UD current President has a personal relationship with Nova Pres and that relationship will go a long way. So in last 7 years , 5 NCAA appearances , a Elite 8 and last year a Number 1 seed. The bottom feeders of the BE are no where close to Dayton’s Performance and more importantly in attendance and TV ratings. There should be a clamor to add UD . The National attention...the rivalry not only with X but the games with Butler /DePaul/Marquette all drivable would be epic . When UD heads East our fans who travel only second to Kentucky fans would fill the Arenas in NY/NJ/DC. Dayton would be a huge positive and the BE would take UD with Grant to the Nova level of recruiting and performance.
Cheech wrote:Money ...TV controls sports. With the virus the game has significantly changed. The BE will go to 12 quicker than expected because of the new reality. Dayton financially is stronger than most BE schools and fits the model. On the court as I told you last summer Grant has taken Dayton to the next level. Coach of year, player of year and hosted College Game Day. UD current President has a personal relationship with Nova Pres and that relationship will go a long way. So in last 7 years , 5 NCAA appearances , a Elite 8 and last year a Number 1 seed. The bottom feeders of the BE are no where close to Dayton’s Performance and more importantly in attendance and TV ratings. There should be a clamor to add UD . The National attention...the rivalry not only with X but the games with Butler /DePaul/Marquette all drivable would be epic . When UD heads East our fans who travel only second to Kentucky fans would fill the Arenas in NY/NJ/DC. Dayton would be a huge positive and the BE would take UD with Grant to the Nova level of recruiting and performance.
Hall2012 wrote:UD's been decent lately and if the Big East had to expand for some reason they probably would make the short list of candidates, but it's not like they're some can't miss candidate that we'd expand just for the sake of adding. Plus it's not like they're going anywhere. They have no chance of ending up in a more desirable conference than the Big East (unless they upgrade football), so we have plenty of time to be patient and see how the college basketball landscape shapes out and they'll still be available.
Hall2012 wrote:As far as Dayton fans traveling...why do we care? We have no trouble filling our arenas.
Hall2012 wrote:Cheech wrote:Money ...TV controls sports. With the virus the game has significantly changed. The BE will go to 12 quicker than expected because of the new reality. Dayton financially is stronger than most BE schools and fits the model. On the court as I told you last summer Grant has taken Dayton to the next level. Coach of year, player of year and hosted College Game Day. UD current President has a personal relationship with Nova Pres and that relationship will go a long way. So in last 7 years , 5 NCAA appearances , a Elite 8 and last year a Number 1 seed. The bottom feeders of the BE are no where close to Dayton’s Performance and more importantly in attendance and TV ratings. There should be a clamor to add UD . The National attention...the rivalry not only with X but the games with Butler /DePaul/Marquette all drivable would be epic . When UD heads East our fans who travel only second to Kentucky fans would fill the Arenas in NY/NJ/DC. Dayton would be a huge positive and the BE would take UD with Grant to the Nova level of recruiting and performance.
A 1 seed, really? When did they release the bracket? Look, you guys had a nice year but let's be real - the A10 was so weak last year that at least half the Big East would've run the table in it. Funny thing is - the last 1 seed to come out of the A10 has already been mentioned in this thread - it was St. Joe's in 2004 and how have things gone for them since? That was pretty much their peak, showing that even if you did get a 1-seed this year, it's no indicator of future success.
As far as Dayton fans traveling...why do we care? We have no trouble filling our arenas.
GoldenWarrior11 wrote:Hall2012 wrote:UD's been decent lately and if the Big East had to expand for some reason they probably would make the short list of candidates, but it's not like they're some can't miss candidate that we'd expand just for the sake of adding. Plus it's not like they're going anywhere. They have no chance of ending up in a more desirable conference than the Big East (unless they upgrade football), so we have plenty of time to be patient and see how the college basketball landscape shapes out and they'll still be available.
Very true about any of the candidates going anywhere. What UConn's return to the Big East absolutely and undeniably established is that the Big East is on a higher pecking order than the AAC (this was widely assumed and talked about, but the BE poaching UConn affirms it). Even if a UD/SLU/VCU etc. moved to the AAC, the BE - with its basketball-first exposure and reputation (not to mention like-minded institutional status) would be able to take them away from the AAC. Side note: this is also my personal belief as to why the AAC has not added another non-football member; losing UConn to the Big East (regardless of what others might say) was a significant blow to their P6 campaign. They cannot afford, long-term, to take another member that could inevitably do the same.Hall2012 wrote:As far as Dayton fans traveling...why do we care? We have no trouble filling our arenas.
It's not a make-or-break quality, however - consider this: one of the main attractions for Creighton was its ability to fill up its arena on a consistent basis (without a BE schedule/affiliation) and their ability to travel in packs to road games (which was especially valuable for the new BET, which was only going to have 10 teams). If one of the long-term goals is to add sessions to the BET, it needs to add programs that have strong fan support (regardless of present level of play) and an ability to travel to games (UD, specifically, was one of the largest fan bases for the A10 tournament in Brooklyn).
Again, neither post is intended to demand the BE expand with UD at present. However, long-term, it is undeniable that a program like UD would be able to add value to the BE (if projections hold true).
Return to Big East basketball message board
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 6 guests